Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Copy-milled Celay In-Ceram ÀüºÎµµÀç°üÀÇ ÆÄÀý°­µµ¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸

A STUDY ON FRACTURE STRENGTH OF CONVENTIONAL AND COPY-MILLED IN-CERAM CROWNS

´ëÇÑÄ¡°úº¸Ã¶ÇÐȸÁö 1997³â 35±Ç 2È£ p.417 ~ 430
ȲÁ¤¿ø, ¾çÀçÈ£, À̼±Çü, Á¤Ç念,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ȲÁ¤¿ø ( Hwang Jung-Won ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
¾çÀçÈ£ ( Yang Jae-Ho ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
À̼±Çü ( Lee Sun-Hyung ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
Á¤Ç念 ( Chung Hun-Young ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç

Abstract


The purpose of this study was to compare the fracture resistance of copy-milled and conventional In-Ceram crown. Four groups of ten uniform sized all-ceramic crowns were fabricated. In-Ceram Spinell and In-Ceram Alumina crowns were fabricated as control group, Celay In-Ceram Spinell and Celay In-Ceram Alumina crowns were fabricated as test group. All specimen were cemented on stainless steel master die with resin cement, and stored in 37degrees C water for 1 day prior to loading in Instron testing machine. Using a steel ball at a crosshead speed of 0.5mm/min, the crowns were loaded at 30degree angle until catastrophic failure occurred. The results obtained were as follows : 1. With the value of 984.8N+/-103.67N, the strength of Celay In-Ceram Alumina crowns had a significantly higher fracture strength than conventional In-Ceram Alumina crowns(876.2N+/-92.20N) (P<0.05). 2. The fracture strength of Celay In-Ceram Spinell crowns(706.3+/-70.59N) was greater than that of conventional In-Ceram Spinell crowns(687.4+/-90.26N), but there was no significant difference(P>0.05). 3. The In-Ceram Alumina crowns had a significantly higher fracture strength than In-Ceram Spinell crowns in both methods(P<0.05). 4. Ther order of fracture strength was as followed :Celay In-Ceram Alumina, In-Ceram Alumina, Celay In-Ceram Spinell and In-Ceram Spinell crowns

Å°¿öµå

In-Ceram;Celay;copy-milling;alumina;spinel;fracture strength

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed